I know the difference between Boylover + Pedophile

Christian BoyLove Forum #57062

Start A New Topic! Submit SRF Thread Index Date Index

I know the difference between Boylover + Pedophile

Posted by The fine art known as Boy on 2009-05-12 21:32:05, Tuesday

A peodophile wants to get into your pants!

A Boylover wants to get into your heart and your pants!

Follow ups:

Re: I know the difference between Boylover + Pedophile - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-14 19:57:07, Thursday (11)

Why Can't? - Cat on 2009-05-15 23:55:41, Friday (6)

Re: Wouldn't it be nice... - Chris on 2009-05-16 00:17:28, Saturday (5)

The correct title for us would be pederast - Eldad on 2009-05-16 09:44:48, Saturday (4)

Re: The correct title for us would be pederast - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-20 20:50:55, Wednesday (0)
Re: The correct title for us would be pederast - Blackstone on 2009-05-16 17:24:55, Saturday (2)

Re: The correct title for us would be pederast - newgeorge on 2009-05-20 15:03:25, Wednesday (0)
Origin of the term pedophile - Blackstone on 2009-05-19 00:40:15, Tuesday (0)

Re: I know the difference between Boylover + Pedop - Chris on 2009-05-14 23:49:06, Thursday (3)

Re: ...and by the way... - Chris on 2009-05-14 23:54:50, Thursday (2)

Re: ...and by the way... - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-15 07:00:01, Friday (1)

Re: ...and by the way... - william on 2009-05-15 21:21:13, Friday (0)

WRONG! - Godspell on 2009-05-13 05:51:46, Wednesday (20)

Re: WRONG! - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-13 06:23:23, Wednesday (19)

Re: actually, WRONG! - Godspell on 2009-05-13 06:31:08, Wednesday (18)

Re: actually, WRONG! - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-13 07:01:40, Wednesday (17)

Re: actually, WRONG! - Godspell on 2009-05-14 04:21:27, Thursday (1)

Re: fascinating stories - Chris on 2009-05-14 23:34:38, Thursday (0)

Re: actually, WRONG! - Blackstone on 2009-05-14 02:49:38, Thursday (4)

But the one on this thread is now a BL! - Eldad on 2009-05-14 10:26:10, Thursday (3)

Re: But the one on this thread is now a BL! - Blackstone on 2009-05-15 03:50:31, Friday (0)
Or perhaps... - Cat on 2009-05-14 14:34:19, Thursday (1)

Re: Or perhaps... - qwerty on 2009-05-15 01:27:20, Friday (0)

Re: actually, WRONG! - qwerty on 2009-05-13 23:17:00, Wednesday (9)

Oh, come on.... - Dakota on 2009-05-17 16:40:12, Sunday (8)

really? - Godspell on 2009-05-17 17:41:30, Sunday (7)

Yes, really - Dakota on 2009-05-17 18:15:11, Sunday (6)

Re: Yes, really - Godspell on 2009-05-18 04:53:37, Monday (5)

There's a thread about this topic on ship of fools - Eldad on 2009-05-21 09:01:52, Thursday (1)

a question to eldad - newgeorge on 2009-05-24 17:26:08, Sunday (0)

PS - Dakota on 2009-05-20 15:42:05, Wednesday (1)

Re: PS - JohnQ on 2009-05-20 19:17:02, Wednesday (0)

Criteria - Dakota on 2009-05-20 15:37:31, Wednesday (0)

Excellent! - Eldad on 2009-05-13 01:42:03, Wednesday (38)

Re: Excellent! - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-13 03:51:04, Wednesday (37)

Not always the case - realivemale on 2009-05-13 07:41:14, Wednesday (36)

Re: Not always the case - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-13 18:40:24, Wednesday (1)

Re: Not always the case - Blackstone on 2009-05-14 02:42:24, Thursday (0)

Re: Not always the case - bigcalv on 2009-05-13 12:30:28, Wednesday (33)

Re: Not always the case - realivemale on 2009-05-14 17:48:04, Thursday (32)

Intersting - Dakota on 2009-05-17 16:27:28, Sunday (30)

Re: Intersting - realivemale on 2009-05-20 06:00:21, Wednesday (25)

Re: Intersting - Blackstone on 2009-05-21 00:56:59, Thursday (0)
Re: Intersting - Dakota on 2009-05-20 19:21:45, Wednesday (1)

Re: Intersting - realivemale on 2009-05-26 04:14:41, Tuesday (0)

No - the New Testament IS clear about sex - Eldad on 2009-05-20 09:57:34, Wednesday (21)

paul is clear about sex - newgeorge on 2009-05-20 13:29:57, Wednesday (20)

It's everywhere in the New Testament - Eldad on 2009-05-21 09:32:30, Thursday (1)

the gospel - newgeorge on 2009-05-21 14:45:40, Thursday (0)

Re: paul is clear about sex - Blackstone on 2009-05-21 01:07:08, Thursday (13)

high moral standards - newgeorge on 2009-05-21 02:09:05, Thursday (12)

Re: high moral standards - Blackstone on 2009-05-21 04:10:23, Thursday (11)

Re: high moral standards - newgeorge on 2009-05-21 14:25:23, Thursday (10)

Re: high moral standards - Blackstone on 2009-05-21 22:59:06, Thursday (8)

Re: high moral standards - newgeorge on 2009-05-22 14:30:56, Friday (7)

huh? - Godspell on 2009-05-23 04:09:32, Saturday (2)

oh yikes - newgeorge on 2009-05-23 12:53:51, Saturday (1)

lectio - Godspell on 2009-05-23 20:45:15, Saturday (0)

Re: high moral standards - Blackstone on 2009-05-23 00:31:44, Saturday (0)
An eloquent statement of the liberal position - Eldad on 2009-05-23 00:25:18, Saturday (2)

that's what I am saying - newgeorge on 2009-05-23 12:48:14, Saturday (1)

Consider your hand firmly shaken! n/t - Eldad on 2009-05-23 20:08:35, Saturday (0)

editing errors - newgeorge on 2009-05-21 14:26:21, Thursday (0)

Ignoring Psul - Dakota on 2009-05-20 16:34:22, Wednesday (3)

Re: Ignoring Paul - newgeorge on 2009-05-20 19:33:52, Wednesday (2)

meant to be humorous - Dakota on 2009-05-20 19:50:53, Wednesday (1)

Re: meant to be humorous - newgeorge on 2009-05-20 19:59:48, Wednesday (0)

please do tell - Godspell on 2009-05-17 17:43:49, Sunday (3)

The I Cor 6 passage - Eldad on 2009-05-18 03:17:02, Monday (0)
Re: please do tell - Dakota on 2009-05-17 18:24:29, Sunday (1)

Re: please do tell - Godspell on 2009-05-27 21:20:44, Wednesday (0)

Re: Not always the case - Blackstone on 2009-05-15 03:59:21, Friday (0)

Re: Maybe but... - Chris on 2009-05-13 00:26:08, Wednesday (9)

Re: Maybe but... - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-13 03:53:42, Wednesday (8)

Re: Maybe but... - blazeofhope on 2009-05-13 07:08:47, Wednesday (7)

Re: I second that! - Chris on 2009-05-14 00:13:48, Thursday (0)
Right on all counts! - The fine art known as Boy! on 2009-05-13 20:46:30, Wednesday (5)

Re: Right on all counts! - blazeofhope on 2009-05-13 23:26:59, Wednesday (4)

Does this challenges 'once gay always gay'? - Eldad on 2009-05-14 10:34:55, Thursday (3)

Re: Does this challenges 'once gay always gay'? - Dakota on 2009-05-17 16:07:19, Sunday (1)

agreed, mostly - Godspell on 2009-05-17 17:36:00, Sunday (0)

Re: Does this challenges 'once gay always gay'? - blazeofhope on 2009-05-14 18:08:35, Thursday (0)

Post a response :

Nickname		Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject

Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?