That's a pretty bold statement, Blackstone, don't you think? I mean, do you know this person so well that you can think that no adult has ever been a friend to this boy and truly loved him? I can tell you there have been many, and none of them felt the need to groom the boy into having sex with him, as his abusers did.

From a quick browse through some of the posts and opinions on this forum, it's pretty obvious that there are those here who would consider that the initial actions of the first of this boy's abusers (before being introduced to the second abuser) to be entirely appropriate and the man would have been considered a boylover. But how the actions of any adult leading a kid into a sexual relationship with him could remotely be considered "beneficial and honouring to God" is beyond comprehension.