Christian BoyLove Forum #56137

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Cost/benefit analysis

Posted by Blackstone on 2009-02-14 04:56:48, Saturday
In reply to Re: Cost/benefit analysis posted by Dakota on 2009-02-13 17:43:18, Friday

However, there are people much smarter than I that do. You can dispute their conclusions, or the studies themselves, but you can't dispute that they're out there.

No, there aren't. Nobody has the data or the statistics to back your view up because sufficient study on this topic simply hasn't occurred. What little scientific data exists on this topic is inconclusive and very little study is likely to occur since last time anyone tried, the outrage over their findings reached congress and stirred up such a crap storm that talks of pulling government funding from psychological studies actually took place (I'm referring of course, to the Rind study).

The idea that risk is likely to occur is taken for granted without adequate study. There are no conclusions out there for me to dispute. Unless...perhaps you have access to some studies I am not aware of? Feel free to point me in their direction.

I think you would agree that the people who believe man/boy sex to be harmfull FAR outnumbers those who don't.

and people who incorrectly believe Dolphins to be fish far outnumber those who know they are mammals. People who believe that humans only use 10% of their brain far outnumber those who know that to be a myth. People who believe homosexual actions are perfectly moral far out number those who do not. Really...what kind of an argument is that?

Since all you have are a few examples of men being sexual with their YFs that you THINK is unharmful (check back with the boys once their adults and ask again)

You make a heck of a lot of incorrect assumptions in this short exchange. Here you are incorrectly assuming that none of those boys have grown up yet. Newsflash, some have.

what makes you so sure you are right and the vast majority are wrong?

I am right because my claim is factually correct. My claim is that I do not know whether harm is the exception or the rule. The person here claiming to have a definitive answer to that question is you, not me. My claim is factually correct, I do not have the evidence to conclude one way or the other.



Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?