Christian BoyLove Forum #56085

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Terminology

Posted by Blackstone on 2009-02-11 00:31:06, Wednesday
In reply to Re: Terminology posted by Dakota on 2009-02-10 05:07:37, Tuesday

I've combined both posts below so as not to keep two conversations going on the same thing.

Do you think it's ok to role the dice with a boy's life for the sake of some physical pleasure?

Yes. As do you, whether you realize it or not.

Whenever you take a boy for a bite to eat, you are risking his life for the sake of some physical pleasure. Traffic accidents are the leading cause of death among children, yet the overwhelming majority of us are willing to accept that risk for the sake of something as trivial as a slice of pizza. Take a boy anywhere and you are risking his life for the sake of a pizza, a ball game, or whatever. So, yes I am willing to roll the dice with a boy's life as are you (assuming you are not agoraphobic or devoid of relationships with boys).

Thus, the question isn't as simple as asking are you willing to accept risk? We all are. The question then becomes which risks are acceptable and which are not? This is the situation secular BLs are faced with. Thankfully, for the Christian it is much simpler because we have a religious imperative to reserve sex for our spouses.

Why would you promote such a thing, even if you think the odds are a hundred to one?

I don't promote such a thing.

Boys are hurt all the time by having sexual contact with adults.

Boys are hurt all the time by: riding their bikes, diving into swimming pools, riding in a car, eating food, climbing trees, etc.

Obviously, the possibility of being hurt does not automatically lead to your refusal to accept an activity; or do you take a stand against all of the above?

If you play the odds with a boy's life, don't you dare call yourself a boylover.

Then there are very few boylovers indeed, for merely having a boy in your car risks their life.

When we get to heaven, which do you think God will focus on more, our knowledge, or our concern for our fellow man (or boy)?

I don't see how this question has any relevance.

But what, in your opinion, is an acceptable percentage?

Thankfully, that's not a question of incredible importance to me, for any decision I make on that is overruled by what the bible says about sexuality.

For the non-christian bl, it is something each person needs to decide for themselves.

How many boys harmed would make it ok for boylovers to use them to gratify their desires? Yeah, I know, you're going to say it's not just about gratification, it's about "showing love." So how many boys harmed would make it ok to "show love" to boys in that manner?

You seem to lack even a basic understanding of the dynamics of a man/boy sexual relationship. It's impossible to answer your question because this "showing love" thing you have in your head appears to have no real resemblance to how these relationships work.

I recommend the book "Loving Sander". It features the most true to life portrayal of a man/boy sexual relationship in print and will help you better understand the dynamics of such relationships and where the BLs in those relationships are coming from. The way you pre-fabricate the expected responses to your questions shows that you really don't know what it is you are talking about here.

Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?