Despite disagreeing with you on many points, I really like the way you think. I hope you don't think I'm being too critical; it is the nature of online forums to be conducive to debate and it's rare that good opportunities for debate come up around here.

Here's something I still have a problem with about your view:
OK, it probably wouldn't be sin. I overstate that. I wouldn't want to go there, though, because, as I just wrote in another post seconds ago, I feel it would be "feeding" the "broken" aspect of my sexual identity.

Loving boys (in a non-sexual context) is a good thing. There are countless boys out there who are desperately in need of love and affection and there is a serious lack of male role models willing to provide that. I don't think I can count the number of times a parent or other adult has thanked me for doing what so few men are willing to do and making a difference in the lives of children. If feeding this makes it stronger, then doing so actually helps make you a better person. Feeding the positive, non-sexual aspects of who you are instead of the destructive sexual aspects is a good thing, if we believe that feeding something makes it stronger.

So, why would you not want to feed the positive aspects of your personality? I don't believe feeding it makes it stronger, but even if it did, why would that be a negative thing? It seems to me that making the loving, caring, non-sexual parts that are most positive stronger would be a good thing, not a bad thing.