In reply to Re: Reflections from those talks I posted about. 2 submitted by blazeofhope on 2008-09-23 04:26:52, Tuesday

You are trying to say it was a general statement although you replied to my post not the author of the original post.

If your remotely even capable of experiencing the emotion known as EMPATHY then put yourself in your wives shoes and you shall have the answer to that question.

The word your is in place of a name if you know your English . So because you (and you takes the place of a name also in this case it is Burdened) responded to me and used the word your, I would have every reason to believe that my character was being attacked. I like how you say it is a general statement when it is clearly not! It is clear that you are talking down to me and I have the right to call you on it. Your real problem is that I can see through your crafty style of writing and that I see it for what it really is and YOU= Burdened do not like that. Then in your last post you say I failed to answer that question, but of course you are just generally speaking!! No you are not speaking to me. Bull I stand behind what I have said and I also have a right to point out what I see to be the truth. And you where speaking directly to me and it is so plain to see that you are only fooling yourself!!