I don't recognize your nick, so let me start out by saying welcome to the board. I apologize if you've been around for a while but I don't recall ever seeing you.

Thank you for sharing your views with us.

Now, let me start out by saying that I do not necessarily disagree with everything you are saying. However, I am adamantly opposed to the way in which you presented everything.

You make a lot of statements of fact for which I doubt you have any solid evidence. In order to be taken seriously, your arguments need to be honest. Only when something is a fact should it be stated as fact. You cannot make unfounded statements of fact and expect us to respect your argument. You should at least couch any statements for which you do not have solid evidence with phrases like "in my opinion...", "my experience has shown that...", "it is my impression that...", or even "as far as I know...".

Let me show you what I mean:

There are 5 kinds of pedophiles in terms of ethics

You state this as fact. However, this is not actually a fact. This is a subjective system of categorization that you unilaterally created and appears to leave out a significant number of pedophiles, most notably the situational pedophiles who make up the majority of child molesters.

The majority of little boy lovers are abstinent

You state this as fact, but unless you can present conclusive evidence, it is nothing more than a guess.

persuadable are not uncommon

Again, do you have conclusive evidence of this? or is it another guess you are deceptively stating as fact?

but probably only a minority of them have ever actually had the experience of being persuaded.

Thank you! For the first time in this post you recognize that what you are stating is nothing more than an assumption. You should use words like "probably" a lot more often.

When they are, the persuasion generally stops at the point of hugging and kissing

Again talking about things as if they are fact when all you really have to show this fact is some anecdotal evidence.

you will almost always have a kid who is fundamentally uninterested

Care to show the evidence that this is a fact?

someone who has a high likelihood of feeling horrified and violated later on

How about this? you have evidence of this?

Most boylovers were not interested in older people when they were young

Do you have any evidence to back this statement up? or is it once again just a guess stated as if it were a fact?

However, circa 1% of boys are differentiated as gay androphiles (lovers of significantly older boys and men) at the normal age for such differentiations.

This time you do use a statistic, so surely you could point me to the research from whence this 1% figure comes? Even if you can, is there enough research out there to call this a fact? If not, your statement would be far more honest if it were phrased as "However, research has shown that only about 1%..."

Aggressive and lunatic as well as most persuasives are unacculturated and you will not find them on BL boards.

Do you have any evidence of this statement?

I actually have evidence that contradicts it. I can think of several people who frequented the BL boards who easily would have fit one or both of those categories. I even know of one that posted several times on this very board. Likewise, I know of BL's and GL's who frequent boards like this one who struggle with desires of a violent nature.