I haven't seen androkotai tossed around once. Could you show me where it appears exactly?"

Certainly. First off the term is "arsenokoitEs" (the capital E being the eta not the epsilon)

Ahh, sorry 'bout forgetting the "i"... for as you note...

arsenokoitai (the plural form)

Yes. 's as I expected, seeing as the bible discusses "fags-or-whatever-the-translation" rather than calling people "fag-or-whatever" in the singular, generally. I do apologize for dropping the "i."

...but secondly...

Certainly. First off the term is "arsenokoitEs" (the capital E being the eta not the epsilon)

Well... two terms, actually. The one everyone knows is - pardon my renaissance-esque pseudogreek - "coitus," in the english spelling of the same word. 'though, as it's used here, it'd be better rendered "coitus-ers" or something, to make it a noun.

...but then there's the other term, the one under question. The majority of this board is usually referred to as androphilic, not arsenophilic. Babies tend to be androgynous, rather than arsenogynous. 'n, of course, would that bad antifeminist stereotypings were misarsenic, rather than misandric.

Hmm... misarsenic. Mis- or miso-...

...arsenic. Where does arsenic get its name, and why was it called that?

1 Corinthians 6:9-10: Be not led astray, neither fornicators nor idolators nor adulterers nor the voluptuous ("the soft ones") nor arsenokoitai (the plural form) nor thieves nor the covetous not drunkards not revilers not the rapacious will inherit the kingdom of Gid

...and why are old ladies slipping arsenic into my tea and bedding my poison-balded corpse when they could just find some man and have heteroandrophilic coitus instead?

Curious questions. Perhaps I will find an answer if I can ever reach the sage of the kingdom of Gid.