I didn't mean to make it sound as though I was calling into question the point you were making about scientific flaws in ex-gay methodology. It's just that there's a lot more to human beings than science. For example, if, tomorrow, scientists should decide that our current understanding of sexual orientation is fundamentally flawed (which wouldn't at all surprise me), that wouldn't erase the fact that I'm attracted to men and women. So I was trying to differentiate between individual experiences and the philosophies and theologies that are used to explain those experiences. Perhaps I was being hypersensitive about the nature of your post, but I've run across too many instances elsewhere of people saying, "Ex-gay theology doesn't work; therefore, ex-gays can't have experienced what they claim to experience."

Dusk


Please don't make public attempts at guessing personal information about other posters, even in jest.---webmaster