You called him a "repentent rapist". That is what got him upset. I don't blame him, it would have gotten me upset. It was not nice, it was not helpful, and it was uncalled for.

I'm... really short on... uhh, I dunno, months of my life - so I'll just put words in your mouth to drag this f'n thing to an end, okay?

Chris : you accused my friend of raping someone.

Me : Actually, I stated - repeatedly - that my assumption about the man involved the speculation that "you're a virgin," and said - repeatedly - that it was a comment on the psychology he put forward.

I will not shirk from the truth. My assertion that he identifies primarily as a rapist is congruent with his assertion that "These boys were there because they were... being sexually abused. ...one of those people could have been me."

If you have some explanation as to how this statement is not identifying as a rapist - which, umm... there are specific individuals, who are in fact rapists, whom Nash is most explicitly identifying with - it would be interesting to see what you come up with.

You seem to be a person who likes stirring up trouble, so I don't blame my friend Nash for his decision to quit talking to you.

I asked him to name his allegation, if he had one.

If he cared to make one, that is in no way too much to ask. No amount of attempting to gratuitously insult me will change that.

Now :

1. Why do you engage in a campaign of false witness?

2. Aside from your campaign of false witness against me, would you happen to have anything to say?

...and no, I will not discuss Yeshua bar YHVH with someone until they have ceased to sin against me. If you wish to ask again when this matter is settled - ask then.