I agree with everything but the last sentence. Why would someone stop being a boylover because they act on the temptation? Boylove is about the feelings, not the actions, and the feelings will continue being boylove no matter what actions you do or do not take.

Well, that is where my own definition of boylove steps in. I think that if you are a boylover, then you wouldn't act on the temptation. But really I can't say that because I am sure there have been people who have acted negatively on the tempation, but still love boys the same as you and me. That person just fell into temptation and made a bad choice, just the same as when we all fall one way or another.

"I think that if you are a boylover, then you wouldn't act on the temptation." Atleast that is what I think being a boylover should mean. So if I were to define boylover, it would be someone who is sexually attracted to boys, but the sexual attraction is not the strongest attraction they have for a boy; someone who is capable of self-control, and does not act on their sexual desire for boys.

But like you said, Boylove is about the feelings, not the actions, and the feelings will continue being boylove no matter what actions you do or do not take. Boylove IS about the feelings, it's not about the actions, so if you can't control your sexual feelings, and don't allow the positive feelings of boylove to shine over the negative, and in turn you eventually act on those feelings, are you capable of calling yourself a boylover?

I am very young in years, so you guys probably have it figured out a lot more than I do, but those are just my thoughts.