I can see your definition and only dissagree for practical reasons.

I kinda think in this circumstance the preist may not have realised that he was (by your definition) raping the boy. But who knows.

I myself prefer the term "mollested". But this is personal preferance. In mollestation (as I see it)... both the mollestor and the mollested may be haveing a great time... and its not until consequences set in later that the mollested realises that there was more cost to this experience than he/she anticipated and starts to have regrets.

In my oppinion most mollestors have some awareness of these costs and even that the child they are mollesting doesn't... but is prepared to pay them for the sake of the sex... without being particularly malicious towards the child they are mollesting.

To me 'rape' is a much more selfish... power driven dynamic... that is less about the sex than about intimidation. But that's my oppinion.

Cat.